Information Today, Inc. Corporate Site KMWorld CRM Media Streaming Media Faulkner Speech Technology DBTA/Unisphere
Other ITI Websites
American Library Directory Boardwalk Empire Database Trends and Applications DestinationCRM Faulkner Information Services Fulltext Sources Online InfoToday Europe KMWorld Literary Market Place Plexus Publishing Smart Customer Service Speech Technology Streaming Media Streaming Media Europe Streaming Media Producer Unisphere Research

Vendors: For commercial reprints in print or digital form, contact LaShawn Fugate (

Magazines > Information Today > January/February 2022

Back Index Forward
Information Today
Vol. 39 No. 1 — Jan/Feb 2022
Insights on Content

Animal Welfare and AI Ethics
by Kashyap Kompella

Much of AI ethics is about reducing the harms to humans, but what about animals? Of course, concern about animal rights is not new, and that movement is well-established. A discussion of animal rights philosophy is beyond the scope of this column. Instead, I want to examine two ways in which AI and animal welfare intersect.


Animal experiments are used extensively in safety studies for many consumer and pharma products. According to Thomas Hartung, writing in The Scientist, toxicity information is missing for a majority of the 100,000 chemicals used in consumer products, and we resort to testing these chemicals on animals, causing them a lot of suffering and pain. So, it’s good news when AI models can predict the toxicity of chemicals and reduce the need for animal testing. To be sure, there are limits to how much AI can replace animal testing, according to an article by Juan Carlos Marvizon at Speaking of Research, but such in silico alternatives are worth exploring further.


As the adoption of autonomous (and semi-autonomous) machines and robots increases, they come into contact with animals (for example, domestic animals and vacuuming robots, farm animals and robot harvesters, or self-driving cars and stray animals). How should such animal-machine interactions be approached? How should the AI algorithms in these machines respond? How should they be programmed to reduce the suffering to animals and look for ways to improve animal welfare? Of course, such concerns exist when service robots are interacting with humans or when cobots (collaborative robots in shared spaces) are working alongside humans. And we already have safety standards defined by ISO so that humans and robots can safely share a workspace. But discussions around ensuring animal welfare are few and far between, and there aren’t many industry efforts to considering animal encounters. For instance, self-driving cars have trouble recognizing animals on the road. 


The trolley problem is a series of thought experiments designed to tease out the ethical norms and values in difficult situations by forcing decisions regarding who will be harmed in a particular scenario. They may seem too simplistic, but trolley problem-like scenarios involving animals can fast become real-life situations as our stock of autonomous machines and vehicles increases. I think for most humans, a machine that prioritizes humans over animals is a no-brainer. But imagine a scenario in which the machine has to choose between damage to property and harm to an animal. There may be no simple or one-size-fits-all answer. The point is that there are choices to be made. On what ethical principles are those decisions going to hinge?

I just discussed two areas—one in which AI can clearly have a role in increasing animal welfare, and the other in which we need to consider and codify animal welfare. There are several other areas that present opportunities as well as pose moral and ethical questions related to animal rights. The scenarios and decisions to be made span a spectrum, including your robot vacuum sparing or squashing a bug it finds while cleaning and considering the impact of an automated drone strike on livestock.

Today, there is a broad consensus that our AI applications adhere to our ethical norms and values. However, both in AI and AI ethics disciplines, there isn’t a major initiative to address the impact of AI on animals. It’s time we expanded the scope of AI ethics to encompass animal welfare.


The Scientist : “Opinion: AI Beats  Animal Testing at Finding Toxic Chemicals”

Speaking of Research: “Computer Models Are Not Replacing Animal Research, and Probably Never Will”

ISO: “Robots and Humans Can   Work Together With New ISO Guidance”

KASHYAP KOMPELLA ( is the CEO of rpa2ai Research, a global AI industry analyst firm, and a contributing analyst at Real Story Group. He is the co-author of Practical Artificial Intelligence. Send your comments about this column to or tweet us (@ITINewsBreaks).