![]() |
![]() |
|
|
| Copyright and Digital Content | |||
| by Linda C. Joseph, Columbus (Ohio) Public Schools, Library of Congress | |||
[Editor's note: URLs mentioned in this article appear in the chart that follows.]
Everything on the Net is public domain. Right? Read the 10 Big Myths About Copyright Explained by Brad Templeton and you will soon have a different perspective. Copyright is the law of the United States that protects the works of authors, artists, composers, and others from being used without permission. In the digital age where massive amounts of information are distributed, it is essential that students know and understand copyright.
Teaching about copyright is not an easy task, because it is based on law. The language can be confusing, and different people can interpret the law differently. Two high-profile court cases are good examples of the opposing viewpoints taken by the individuals involved. In New York Times Co., Inc., et al. v. Tasini et al., six freelance authors claim their copyrights were infringed. They contributed articles to three periodicals. Their articles, along with others from the periodicals, were placed in three databases by LexisNexis and UMI, electronic publishers. The freelance writers believed that their copyrights had been infringed by the inclusion of their articles in the databases. However, the print publishers (New York Times, Newsday, and Time) and copyright holders of the collective works believed they were simply distributing and reproducing the author's copyrighted material as granted to them under the copyright law. Both sides relied on Chapter 17 of the United States Code dealing with Ownership of Copyright (17 U.S.C. § 201(c)).
(c) Contributions to Collective Works.—Copyright in each separate contribution to a collective work is distinct from copyright in the collective work as a whole, and vests initially in the author of the contribution. In the absence of an express transfer of the copyright or of any rights under it, the owner of copyright in the collective work is presumed to have acquired only the privilege of reproducing and distributing the contribution as part of that particular collective work, any revision of that collective work, and any later collective work in the same series.
On June 25, 2001, the Supreme Court agreed with the Second Circuit Court that §201(c) does not give publishers the right to copy the articles because they are no longer in context with the original collective work. Therefore, the print publishers and electronic publishers infringed the copyrights of the freelance authors. Only time will tell what impact this ruling will have on the electronic libraries and databases that have been information reference sources in libraries for over a decade.
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster was a battle over the rights to music files. Napster provided a service in which members could share music files, called peer-to-peer file sharing. Record companies believed Napster was infringing on copyrights by allowing wide distribution of the files, thereby depriving them of revenue. Napster called it fair use. The Ninth Circuit Court rejected the fair use premise and ruled that Napster knew its users were violating copyright laws. Napster was allowed to remain in service, but was ordered to block transfers of copyrighted music. Napster was working on song-filtering software to police copyright, but the number of songs available for trade had dropped dramatically. Napster's eulogy may already have been written.
Read about copyright by
visiting the sites below. Consider the similarities and differences with
fair use, public domain, and copyright. What are the key components that
students need to know about copyright and information on the Web? Next,
examine the lesson by Laura Kaemming presented in the sidebar. Then, think
about how you would introduce copyright in your classroom.
10 Big Myths About Copyright Explained
Test your knowledge about
copyright. The questions in this article are great for generating lively
discussions in the classroom. You will be surprised with some of the answers.
Copyright and K-12: Who Pays in the
Network Era?
Another thought-provoking
article is David Rothman's "Copyright and K-12: Who Pays in the Network
Era?" His premise is that with current law, children must pay the ultimate
price because inadequate budgets will not allow schools to pay licensing
fees. Several issues are presented: what networks mean to teachers and
students, how copyright may affect K-12 networking, attitudes of educators,
and options for a solution.
Copyright Clearance Center
The Copyright Clearance
Center (CCC) is a not-for-profit organization created to help organizations
comply with U.S. copyright law. With over 1.75 million titles, the CCC
provides authorized users with a lawful means to make photocopies.
Copyright Management Center
Fair use allows you to
use a limited amount of copyrighted material for your educational use.
Think about the material you want to use in your report. Does it pass these
tests? Why do you want to use the material? In what way do you want to
use the material? How much of the material do you want to use? Will your
use deprive the author of making money? To help students answer these questions
about what information they may or may not be able to use in their projects,
have them use the Fair Use Checklist. It was designed around Section 107
of the Copyright Act of 1976. There are also many links to articles about
fair use.
Copyright Website
Want some great examples
of copyright cases to use with students? Then, check out the Copyright
Website. Are purple dinosaur costumes an infringement on Barney? Who owns
the rights to James Bond? Have musicians ever crossed the line with their
creative talents and used someone else's music? In addition, there is information
on how to create your own copyright notice and registering your works with
the copyright office.
Cut and Paste Plagiarism
For information about preventing,
detecting, and tracking down plagiarism on the Web, visit Cut and Paste
Plagiarism. The author defines plagiarism and provides a straightforward
way of introducing the topic in your classroom.
Fair Use Guidelines for Educational
Media
A more recent document,
"Fair Use Guidelines for Educational Multimedia," adopted by the House
Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property in September
1996, can be found at the Consortium for College and University Media Centers,
Indiana University.
U.S. Copyright Office
For basic copyright information,
current legislation, and international agreements, go to the United States
Copyright Office. For guidelines on what you may copy as a teacher, read
"Reproduction of Copyrighted Works by Educators and Librarians" at the
Library of Congress.
Who's Going to Know?
If you violate copyright,
you will know. If you worked really hard to create something would you
want someone else to take credit? The best policy is to ask permission
and give attribution.
|
||
| Copyright
and Fair Use Web Sites
10 Big Myths About Copyright
Explained
Copyright and K-12: Who
Pays in the Network Era?
Copyright Clearance Center
Copyright Management
Center
Copyright Website
Cut and Paste Plagiarism
Fair Use Guidelines for
Educational Media
U.S. Copyright Office
Court Opinions A&M Records v.
Napster Summary
Ninth Circuit Home Page
Supreme Court Collection—New
York Times Co., Inc., et al. v. Tasini et al.
Supreme Court of the
United States
|
||
| Teaching
About Copyright
Laura Kaemming, a teacher from Toledo, Ohio, created a wonderful lesson about copyright. One of the activities she created for her students allows them to actively think about copyright issues by listening to music and reviewing interesting court cases. For a copy of the entire lesson, including the copyright worksheet, visit the CyberBee Web site. Grade Level: Eighth Grade Objectives: 1. Students will be introduced to and develop a basic understanding of copyright laws. 2. Students will identify examples of copyright infringement. Materials: Music Alive magazine (December 2000 issue); musical excerpts from: "Ice, Ice Baby," as performed by Vanilla Ice, "Under Pressure," as performed by Queen; "My Sweet Lord," as performed by George Harrison, "He's So Fine" as performed by The Chiffons, "I Want a New Drug," as performed by Huey Lewis and the News, "Ghostbusters," as performed by Ray Parker, Jr.; Checklist for Fair Use from http://www.iupui.edu/%7Ecopyinfo/fuchecklist.html, overheads; "Copyright" and "You Be the Judge" worksheets; written test. Procedure: Day One
|
||
| Worksheet
1: You be the Judge!
Name ____________________ Class _______ Date _____________ [Editor's note: The Copyright Web site is a good resource for this activity.] CASE 1: In 1976, ex-Beatle George Harrison was found guilty of copyright infringement for his hit single, "My Sweet Lord." Bright Tunes Music Corporation had obtained the copyright for the 1963 hit, "He's So Fine," which was written by Ronald Mack and originally performed by The Chiffons. Did George Harrison borrow his musical ideas from Mack's hit song? Judge for yourself. Look at the motifs on the overhead and listen to parts of the two songs. RATING SYSTEM: 5=Exactly the same 4=Very similar 3=Somewhat alike 2=Barely the same 1=Not alike in any way Melody: __________ Harmony/Chordal Structure: __________ Rhythm: __________ Tempo: __________ Lyrics: __________ Instruments: __________ 1. How else are the two songs similar?_________________________ ________________________________________________________ 2. How are the two songs different? __________________________ _______________________________________________________
CASE 2: In 1981, Huey Lewis (Hugh Cregg) accused Ray Parker, Jr. of copyright infringement after Parker released his single "Ghostbusters." After more than 10 years of arguing, the two artists settled their case in private. Parker never publicly admitted his guilt, but he did agree to pay an undisclosed amount to Lewis for "damages." The issue was brought up again during the spring of 2001. Lewis had taped a VH-1 Behind the Music segment and disclosed details of the 1995 settlement. Parker filed a lawsuit against Lewis in March 2001. Parker claims Lewis broke the "confidentiality agreement." Apparently part of the original settlement banned them both from revealing any information that was not in a press release they jointly issued at that time. Parker is asking for an unspecified amount of money to compensate him for "punitive" damages and to cover his lawyer's fees. No matter the outcome ... "who ya gonna call?" You be the judge! RATING SYSTEM: 5=Exactly the same 4=Very Similar 3=Somewhat alike 2=Barely the same 1=Not alike in any way Melody: __________ Harmony/Chordal Structure: __________ Rhythm: __________ Tempo: __________ Lyrics: __________ Instruments: __________ 3. How else are the two songs similar?____________________ _________________________________________________ 4. How are the two songs different? ____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ 5. Based on what you have learned, how have Ray Parker, Jr. and Vanilla Ice broken the copyright laws? Be specific. ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________
|
Linda Joseph is the author
of Net Curriculum: An Educator’s
Guide to Using the Internet, published by CyberAge Books. The recipient
of numerous awards, in addition to her work in the Columbus Public Schools
and the Library of Congress, Linda is a part-time instructor for Ohio State
University. Communications to the author may be addressed to her at Columbus
Public Schools, 737 East Hudson Street, Columbus, OH 43211; 614/365-5277;
ljoseph@iwaynet.net.
Information Today Home Page |
Home Page |
Current Issue |
Top |
Copyright © 2001, Information
Today Inc. All rights reserved.
Feedback