Online KMWorld CRM Media Streaming Media Faulkner Speech Technology Unisphere/DBTA
Other ITI Websites
American Library Directory Boardwalk Empire Database Trends and Applications DestinationCRM EContentMag Faulkner Information Services Fulltext Sources Online InfoToday Europe Internet@Schools Intranets Today ITIResearch.com KMWorld Library Resource Literary Market Place OnlineVideo.net Plexus Publishing Smart Customer Service Speech Technology Streaming Media Streaming Media Europe Streaming Media Producer



Magazines > Information Today > October 2004
Back Index Forward
 




SUBSCRIBE NOW!
Information Today

Vol. 21 No. 9 — October 2004

OPINION
No One Rules the Net, Not Yet
By Dick Kaser


"The Internet has evolved in a way that ensures no one person or entity is 'in charge.'"—The Internet Society

"Internet governance." This was the dark horse of last year's World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), when at the midnight hour it emerged from a bevy of issues to almost derail the adoption of the summit's declaration of principles and action plan.

In a quick sidestep, WSIS Phase I remanded the matter to the United Nations.

Now as preparations begin for Phase II of the World Summit (to be held in November 2005 in Tunis), the Internet governance issue has already become a front-runner on the fast track.

What makes it so hot? Everything!

Though some would dismiss Internet governance as just a technical discussion about infrastructure and backbone, it has the potential to be much, much more.

"Like one of those Russian nested toys," observed a team of researchers at Syracuse University, "we have opened the WSIS Phase I egg to find inside an Internet governance egg" (http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/forum/intgov04/contributions/mueller-resentation.pdf).

The myriad social issues that might surface in this discussion concern the information community too: copyright and trademark protection, security, privacy, fair use, and spam control. The question is: Do we need a little tighter control over the Net to achieve our goals for these things?

The entire inventory of public policy issues is so large and so broad that experts are putting forward discussion papers on how to organize the information so that it can be processed in a reasonable amount of time. (See The Taxonomy of Internet Governance at http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/forum/intgov04/
contributions/taxonomy_internet_governance.pdf
.)

Though there have been some ramp-up discussions, including some of the papers I've noted here, the talks will officially begin in earnest during the next few months. In fact, as we go to press, the WSIS-mandated, U.N.-appointed Working Group on Internet Governance is holding its kickoff meeting. On the group's agenda is the task of defining itself.

Whatever its working framework turns out to be, WSIS Phase I has instructed it to define what the term "Internet governance" shall mean in the context of this discussion, identify the public policy issues that need to be addressed, and get the various stakeholders (including governments) to agree on what their role should rightly be in all of this—all by next July.

Wow! And I thought my boss gave me tough assignments.

Which parts of the Internet need to be governed? Can those parts be governed effectively with agencies that already exist? Does an official international body actually need to be invented to supervise the Net? And if so, for what purposes?

With issues like these on the table, I say hold onto your packet switches, my friends. The ether's about to explode with opinions on this subject. For it won't just be the United Nations that hashes this out—it will be the international Internet community.

So what do you think? Is that which flourished on its own up till now due for proper management? And if so, what, when, where, how, and by whom?

Monitor official developments at http://www.itu.int/wsis/preparatory2/wgig/background.html.


Dick Kaser is Information Today, Inc.'s vice president of content. His e-mail address is kaser@infotoday.com.
       Back to top