Online KMWorld CRM Media Streaming Media Faulkner Speech Technology Unisphere/DBTA
Other ITI Websites
American Library Directory Boardwalk Empire Database Trends and Applications DestinationCRM EContentMag Faulkner Information Services Fulltext Sources Online InfoToday Europe Internet@Schools Intranets Today ITIResearch.com KMWorld Library Resource Literary Market Place OnlineVideo.net Plexus Publishing Smart Customer Service Speech Technology Streaming Media Streaming Media Europe Streaming Media Producer



Magazines > Information Today > April 2003
Back Index Forward
 




SUBSCRIBE NOW!
Information Today
Vol. 20 No. 4 — April 2003
OPINION
Do You Yahoo!?
By Dick Kaser

Paul McFedries was on the receiving end of a cease-and-desist notice from Google lawyers after having published a definition for the new verb "google" at his Word Spy Web site (http://www.wordspy.com) earlier this year. The site tracks new terms that are coming into common usage and is a popular destination for wordsmiths.

Word Spy's definition is:

google (GOO-gul) v. To search for information on the Web, particularly by using the Google search engine; to search the Web for information related to a new or potential girlfriend or boyfriend.—Googling pp.

Though more than one commentator on this topic has noted that you can't trademark a verb, it looks to me like McFedries has tried to appease the lawyers anyway by adding a note to his definition that acknowledges the Google name (at least its noun form) as having trademark status.

The whole incident raises an interesting point about the protection of trademarks in general.

Trademark lawyers, of course, would argue that diminution of the mark is at issue. Everybody knows the horror stories of how Kleenex became synonymous with "facial tissue" and how Xerox became one with the act of making a photocopy.

Ah, the painful agony of becoming so successful and important to the culture that your name crosses over into popular usage. In these cases, the runaway success of a product becomes its ultimate failure as a distinctive brand name. What a (marvelous) dilemma.

Interestingly enough, when I googled the term "googling" on Google™, I got 21,600 hits (delivered to me in 0.16 seconds). You'd think if the Google lawyers really wanted to pursue this, they might start by suppressing the term on their own engine.

As this editorial's headline recalls, a very famous advertising campaign by Yahoo!® actually encouraged the use of that brand name as a verb when it asked, "Do You Yahoo!?"

I may be stepping out of line here because I really haven't asked our lawyers, but I for one would be delighted if people respected this publication so much that they'd refer to the act of finding out what was happening in our industry as "InfoToday-ing."

(Note: Google is a trademark identifying the search technology and services of Google Technologies, Inc. Our use of the term "googling" does not in any way imply that we want you to think of Google™ as being synonymous with searching the World Wide Web.)

Have your trademark lawyers contact me at kaser@infotoday.com.

 


Dick Kaser is Information Today, Inc.'s vice president of content. His e-mail address is kaser@infotoday.com.
       Back to top